Wells Fargo ends forced arbitration for sexual harassment claims

This post was originally published on this site

2/2 © Reuters. A Wells Fargo logo is seen at the SIBOS banking and financial conference in Toronto© Reuters. A Wells Fargo logo is seen at the SIBOS banking and financial conference in Toronto 2/2

By Imani Moise

(Reuters) – Wells Fargo (NYSE:) & Co on Wednesday ended its forced arbitration policy for employee sexual harassment claims, opening the lender to potential lawsuits in the future.

The San Francisco-based bank made the decision following a shareholder proposal from Clean Yield Asset Management which has since been withdrawn, asking for a public analysis of mandatory arbitration’s impact on sexual assault claims within the company.

“Wells Fargo has zero tolerance for sexual harassment,” David Galloreese, head of human resources at Wells Fargo, wrote in an article posted on the company’s internal and external websites. “The treatment of sexual harassment claims has become an increasingly prominent issue across industries.”

The new policy applies to all future harassment claims.

Since 2015, Wells Fargo has required employees to sign arbitration agreements when they are hired to that require them to settle workplace disputes privately, not in court.

In December, a representative from Clean Yield Asset Management, an impact investing firm with a roughly $2,000 stake in Wells Fargo, submitted a proposal asking the board to conduct a review of mandatory arbitration’s effect on sexual harassment claims and make the report public.

“Wells Fargo has raised the bar for financial institutions aiming to root out sexual harassment in the workplace,” said Clean Yield’s Director of Shareholder Advocacy, Molly Betournay. “We urge other companies, particularly other big banks, to follow suit.”

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Add Comment