This post was originally published on this site
Notable highlights include the advancement of the company’s disposal program, the issuance of new debt to improve debt maturity, and strategic initiatives aimed at boosting competitiveness and sustainability.
Despite a slight decrease in automotive production, Forvia confirmed expectations of at least 90 million cars for the year and reported organic growth across various business divisions.
Forvia’s first quarter performance sets a positive tone for the company’s strategic direction, focusing on achieving its POWER25 objectives and strengthening its financial position. The company’s proactive approach to managing its portfolio and debt, along with strategic partnerships and initiatives, positions it well for future growth amidst a stabilizing automotive market.
Operator: Good morning. This is the conference operator. Welcome and thank you for joining today’s Forvia First Quarter 2024 Sales Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Olivier Durand, Group Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead, sir.
Olivier Durand: Thank you. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Q1 business overview call of Forvia. I am today with our Investor Relations team, Marc Maillet and Sebastian Lora. We will cover today the key events of Q1 for our company, and in particular, our revenue results for Q1, our progress in the delivery of our POWER25 strategic plan for which the central objective, as you know, is the deleveraging of the company and the confirmation of our guidance, ‘24 and ambition ‘25. On the achievement, the key achievements of Q1 ‘24. On the revenue side, we have achieved an outperformance of 390 basis points in Q1 in sales. We have recorded solid order intake at €6.5 billion, up €1 billion compared to the last period of ‘23. We have achieved already 25% of our second €1 billion disposal program. And we have issued €1.2 billion of new debts, replacing existing ones in order to extend our debt maturity and we have been able not only to do a large bond with maturity at ‘29 and ‘31 but also to come back to the Sulchine market. Before going to the commercial activity, I would like to highlight elements on key projects that we have. The first one is, of course, EU-FORWARD, which is – which has been launched in February. This is a 5-year project, aiming at restoring full competitiveness in Europe throughout our portfolio. I would like to highlight that the project is in good motion. We are executing properly site by site and we are confirming all the objective associated to it, €500 million of savings by ‘28 with savings already in ‘24. And also restructuring costs that are increasing slightly compared to our run rate, but the excess compare to the average is only €275 million over ‘24 to ‘28. And I confirm that this is all embarked in our – all our objectives, and are helping to achieve them and not the opposite. We don’t do these actions lightly, but we consider this is necessary in order to make sure that Europe is fully competitive throughout the portfolio. Last message, we have indeed some other capacities, but there are specific location and specific activities and we are delisting them in a selective manner. The second topic is about the development of our reach in China. A key element is the signature of a joint venture with Chery in the field of smart and sustainable cockpits with a goal to develop €1 billion of revenues by 2029, and you will see already impact of this even this year and more in ‘25. The interest of this joint venture is twofold: Chery, one of the wider of this market and it allows to have diversification in our reach; and second, this is about working on the full cabin scope and leveraging the integrating factors that we can provide as Forvia. The second one is that we continue our journey on developing a sustainability offer and in particular, in the context of sustainable materials. You know that we created this company called MATERI’ACT. We are now, in fact, in implementation mode with partnership in different geography. You see for North America, the signature of a joint venture with the company in Texas called PCR Recycling, which is aiming at being one of the winners of this industry in that country. So, it’s – the company will be called MATERI’ACT Dallas. And we have signed recently last week an agreement with GREE, which is a €27 billion company in China to develop also new materials and applications in that country. Now moving on to more of the commercial side and the commercial performance. So first of all, we have reached robust order intake of €6.5 billion, which is interesting in different aspects. You see that in terms of typology of activity, we continue to grow, in fact, the Electronics business, €2.3 billion is on this side out of the €6.5 billion. And you see that Asia has represented the majority of the order intake in the first quarter with something – a balance between Chinese OEM and international OEM throughout this large geography. And last but not least, we have been able to inside this number to get a large order with a premium German OEM for complete feeds more than €1 billion. We continue to exercise selectivity in the order intake, ensuring that the profitability and the level of performance is in line with our POWER25 objectives. Now moving on to the market itself. The market is showing clearly a confirmation of stabilization overall and is true both in Q1, in which you see the automotive production has been down slightly, minus 0.8%, and the confirmation of the market of at least of 90 million cars for the year. Inside this one, there is clearly a slowdown of the electrification that slowed down electrification in Europe. The penetration is continuing to grow. In fact, if you take the European market, the overall market is minus 8%, but inside this, the electric cars have been stable. So the penetration of electric cars continue to grow but not at the same pace as before. And you see that overall for the year, we continue to see a growth of electrification from 10% in ‘22, 12% in ‘23 and expected according to the latest report of S&P at 15%, driven largely by China. Important to note for us since we have bold on the two sides, we have developed a large electric offering. Thanks to, in particular, to the acquisition of Ela, and by vice versa with the Clean Mobility activity, the fact that there is a slowdown of some parts of the market in terms of electrification is enlarging the benefits of the Clean Mobility activity. In this context, we are posting a 3.1% increase on an organic basis and therefore, 390 basis points outperformance versus the market. In terms of scope, we have a marginal impact with two elements in opposite directions. We have a negative, of course, from the disposal of commercial vehicle that we did last year effect beginning of Q4. So we have the quarter that is out. And vice versa, we have revisited the partnership with one of our partners in lighting in China, which allows us now to fully consolidate this company whereas it was on an equity basis before and it shows the enlargement of our ambition in China. Last but not least, we have a sizable currency effect, which is on the Chinese yuan but also the consequence of hyperinflation in Argentina and Turkey, which has been particularly the case in the recent period. And therefore, in particular in H1, you have a negative effect on the meaning that on an imported basis, we are slightly down year-on-year. If I move business by business, so starting by Seating. Seating, which represents 30% of our revenues as an organic growth of 1%, i.e., an outperformance of 180 basis points and actually a 3% organic growth, if you would exclude the exits that we signed last year on the just-in-time activity in Highland Park, as you know, which was our difficult contract in that place that we exit at the end of September. So you will see this effect for the first three quarters. Inside this one double-digit increase in North America driven by Ford (NYSE:F). We have a marginal single-digit decrease in China in which you have the drop of sales on BYD that I will come back to. And vice versa, we have the ramp up with new Chinese customers, the development of the diversification as we knew that there was a certain dependency on BYD already last year. On Interiors, we have an outperformance of 560 basis points i.e., organic growth of 4.8%. This is driven by the development of the activity in China and the development in Europe with Renault (EPA:RENA) and HELLA. So it’s a solid growth in this area. One positive surprise potentially is the Clean Mobility activity. The slowdown of electrification means that, in fact, the addressable market of exhaust systems is declining less than what people would expect. And as we grow market share, and we have also the positive effect that the hybrid system is more complex and more expensive than the pure IC model. We have, in fact, an increase of our activity on an organic basis of 6.8%. And as you know, is one of our best margins if not the best margin we have in currently. So you see the growth by geography. Let me remind that this activity is the most balanced between the three big markets, i.e., in fact, we are able to benefit from that and sustain variations. On Electronics, we have an outperformance of 390 basis points. This is largely driven by the growth of Clarion Electronics while, in fact, HELLA Electronics is penalized by the slowdown in the electrification, which is in Europe, in which there is a large presence. Last, Lighting and Lifecycle Solutions. So in Lighting, we have an outperformance of 210 basis points. But I would like to mention that we have a large scope effect, which is the consolidation of this HBBL joint venture in China. This company was, in fact, on an equity basis. The partner has not changed. We have revisited the agreement with them in order to maximize the development. And we are now fully consolidating and which means that we are growing. In fact, we changed OEM in Lighting as part of our common go-to-market, thanks to the Forvia combination. On Lifecycle, the Lifecycle continues to have a good pace. You know that this is our B2C activity in which the pass-through of inflation is a positive factor and with the solid profitability associated. So this is a good group to have as part of our portfolio. Now if I move from a regional standpoint, the overall outperformance is centered around North America and Europe. You see Americas a 12% increase and it is in fact, with a stronger performance in North America, which is particularly notable because you have also the voluntary exit of Highland Park that is a negative there for €40 million in sales. You have good growth in EMEA and in particular, 440 basis points in Europe, and we say Europe, excluding Russia because, of course, as you know, we have vacated any activity in that country. On Asia, we have actually a contrasted performance. We have, on the one side, number performance in China. We have grown the market but less including the joint venture, but we have a number performance. This was expected given the unfavorable customer mix, the high comparable and the fact that BYD has revisited the market sharing in Seating. I would like to highlight, in particular, on China that last year, we had something like a 14% outperformance in Q1. You see that mix between customers, variation, the performance between customers can have impact. And I will come back to this. Vice versa, we are developing largely the rest of the region. We have a stronger performance in Japan. We have development with Honda (NYSE:HMC). We have inroads in India, which is probably one of the most interesting markets from a growth standpoint outside China for the future. So this is allowing, in fact, to have an overall situation for Asia with actually outperformance of 20 basis points. Let me move in more details about Asia indeed. So you see on the first – on the left, the evolution of our revenues in China. So we continue to grow in the country. We have – we are, in fact, dealing with the high comparable of last year. You see clearly the evolution EBITDA between ‘22 and ‘23. And as we explained, we have been working on the diversification in order to reduce our dependency on BYD and benefit from the growth of the other actor. Last message, we have also clearly the fact that BYD has slowed down in terms of growth. BYD has increased production only by 8% in Q1 only between brackets compared to their recent performance. This evolution versus market should normalize in H2 to return to, in fact, a more balance with the market in that period. Outside China, we’re accelerating the growth, and you see the evolution. The potential is quite large with our initial positioning. I would like to highlight that we are benefiting from the acquisition of clients some years back, which allowed to have real presence in Japan with the Japanese OEM, and that we have been able to extend this risk with Japanese OEM outside Nissan (OTC:NSANY), which was the historical customer to Honda, Suzuki. And I would like to say Maruti Suzuki, in fact, which is one of the key players in India. And on the other side, we have also some good base. So we are able to grow this part of the cake, which was a limitation historically for our company. And on the right-hand side, we highlight in fact, the key elements fueling the growth for the future. I mentioned the joint venture, HBBL, which will be doing last year, the €250 million of sales, so you can expect growth from this one. The joint venture share recently signed sharing on the integrated cockpit offer with a goal of €1 billion sales by ‘29 and the sizable and diverse order intake €11 billion last year, €3.6 billion in Q1. So we have the elements to grow in a diversified fashion in this market as Asia. Now moving to the second key elements, which is traction on our POWER25 objective, which is the deleveraging and the reduction of our financial costs. And on these two message to pass, the first one, we have achieved already 25% of our goal on the second asset disposals with €250 million either closed. We received the money from the sale of the 50% stake of the FTC on early April. And we signed an agreement to sell Hug Engineering to venture company called OGEPAR. This is another sign of a cleanup of the portfolio on the ICE footprint. This is also an ex-system not for car or vehicles, but more for plants and boats, and it’s a continuation of what we did with the CBI disposal to coming last year. So 25% achieved and we have traction on the other side the goal is clearly to deliver this one in over ‘24, ‘25. On the second point, on the maturities and our debt management, we have done quite a bit in the first 3 months of the year with two big operations. First of all, eurobond of €1 billion with two comps, one for ‘29 and one for ‘31. €500 million at 4.96% and €500 million at 5.37% which is – and the second one is the return to the full share market with €200 million for maturities of 3, 5 and 7 years. This is leading, in fact, to capacity to reduce all the maturities that are in ‘24, ‘25 and continue to attack the ‘26 as well. And you see on a pro forma basis, the evolution of maturities further to this operation. Our goal is, of course, to work on the maturities, to work on it with good conditions and also to reduce the gross debt, and we will see a reduction of the gross debt again in H1 results. In this context, I confirm the guidance for ‘24. In terms of revenues, €27.5 billion to €28.5 billion. The outperformance that we reached in Q1 is in the 300 to 500 range that we are winning and that we have shown since the creation of Forvia, so we continue on this trend. Improvement on the operating margin with a range of 5.6% to 6.4% of the revenues. Net cash flow at least at the level of €223 million, which was €649 million. And as a consequence, a further reduction of our leverage, we were at 2.1x at the end of last year. We aim to be below 1.9x at the end of this year. And that should put us in the right track to deliver on our strategic plan, POWER25, which is revenues around €30 billion, operating margin above 7%, net cash flow 4% and a leverage below 1.5x. And this excludes, in fact, the impact of the second disposal program. So you understand that our goal is to be clearly better than this 1.5x swap throughout the different operations that we have done and that we are doing. On this note, I’m ready for questions with my colleagues.
Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] The first question is from Michael Jacks, Bank of America. Please go ahead.
Michael Jacks: Hi, good morning, Olivier. Thank you for the presentation. I’ll start out with pricing. What was the contribution in Q1 from inflation compensation? And then perhaps linked to that, some suppliers have reflected that compensation for wage inflation in 2023 was received mainly through lump sum payments, which means that 2024 negotiations needs to cover more than just current year inflation. Is this also the case with Forvia? And how confident are you that this can be achieved? And then one final question. I know you mentioned Ford, but could you please provide a little bit more color on the strong outperformance in North America? Was this driven by any specific program? Or is it more rebound in production by Ford in general? Thank you.
Olivier Durand: Thank you. Good morning. So on the inflation. So the inflation recovery and contribution in Q1 is something like 60, 70 basis points inside this 290 basis points above performance. On the recurrence, non-recurrent aspect and the difficulty to recover the inflation. This is clearly a topic for all the suppliers. So let’s be very clear. We are organized to make sure that we are recovering the inflation. It’s not easy. It’s a daily discussion case by case, but this is clearly a focus area, and we are starting all our business reviews with our different business group by the inflation recovery. On the recurrent and recurrent, you have, in fact, the two situations. You have some ransom agreement. You have some recurrent agreement. And we have also constellation of what existed before, which were LTA. LTA means annual price reductions. So you have a combination of the three, which we understand that, of course, the two parties have different views on this. The reality, we have to get it. Two other message maybe to pass on this. Number one, EU-FORWARD is about reducing our cost base. So you understand that producing our public base is also to recover the impact of the inflation on our side. And the last message is that in terms of salary inflation, this has been so far lower than last year. Let’s see what happens in ‘25, but the level of salary inflation we are facing has started to moderate. On NAO over performance, it’s quite a lot related to start the production of new programs more than strictly a market growth.
Michael Jacks: Okay, very clear. Thank you.
Operator: The next question is from José Asumendi of JPMorgan. Please go ahead.
José Asumendi: Good morning, Olivier. José Asumendi of JPMorgan. Three topics, please. The first one, can you elaborate a little bit more where are the excess pockets of capacity in which region and roughly which products so we can understand a bit better the plans to adjust capacity. Second, are you confident on offsetting the labor cost increases with productivity gains in 2024? Or do you think this is going to be a topic that you will be tackling more in the second half of the year? Or the question is more, are you making progress in the first half to offset those lower cost increases specifically? And then three if you please comment on how you want to improve the outperformance to coal production, specifically in Seating. And also in China, what’s the path to improve their performance into the second half of the year? Thank you.
Olivier Durand: Good morning, José. So on the capacity, so really, I would like to stress the message that they are in specific locations and specific type of activities. So you have – is related also to the nature of the business. So we have some other capacities in some part of interiors because those are big machines and also quite a big dedicated to a specific model or group of models. So if there is adjustment in the level, this has an impact. So that’s why we are addressing the specific cases and the specific countries, so it’s not exactly the same everywhere. The other overcapacity we have is obvious, which is the Clean Mobility exhaust system. The fact is that the electrification is slowing down in Europe does not slow us down on our side. So we are executing the restructuring action. And since the size of the individual Clean Mobility exams sites are limited, this is actually easier to do, and we have already initiated some in Q1. So Clean Mobility, obvious, the rate and pace of the electrification can vary, but the driver of the adjustment is related to the number of engines and the number of has happened. So if anything, it is helping us to convert in cash this activity. So we will do a thorough update on EU forwards in the publication of H1 showing the actions in terms of sites and giving you more elements and more details on the specific over capacity. But once again, this is not a general situation. And on the HELLA part, a lot is relating first of all, to ensure that we do not increase headcount and cost. So we have across the company and across the whole company, we have recruitment fee in Europe. And this is why I’m saying that the plant is reaching already savings in H1 because you don’t need a picturing measure is, in fact, avoiding costs. On the inflation recovery, you will see a seasonality between H1 similar to last year. I would like not to have it but this is a reality of the commercial negotiations. We will have more recovery in H2 than in H1, and it will participate to a seasonality of our operating margin between H1 that probably will have a similarity to what you have seen last year in Forvia. Clearly, we are taking the measures to lease that. But today, this is what I see. And vice versa, we don’t want to do a deal that will be nice on H1, but then bad at midterm. On the last question, just to be sure, José, you want some color on the outperformance in Seating in China. Is that correct?
José Asumendi: Yes. It looks like those are the two pockets of Forvia. We can accelerate improving the second half of the year between Q2 and the end of the year. So it will be great, yes, if you can add more color, if possible. Thank you.
Olivier Durand: So maybe let me start with China. The China activities is more diverse than it has been in the recent past. BYD, OB activity as a consequence of evolution of market share on the seat that was known and agreed with them. The impact is probably a bit more than what we – that was expected before given the evolution of production of BYD for the beginning of the year. That reinforce the benefits and the logic of what we have done, which is to develop with the other ones. We have double with Li Auto (NASDAQ:LI) and we continue to grow. By the way, Li Auto is one of the customer inside the PBL lighting joint venture. We have this joint venture agreement with Chery, which I think is the first time that we have an agreement on a combined cockpit of the future strategy with a given customer, highlighting a different approach that the newcomers are taking, in particular, in this part of the world. And the speed of China being what it is, there will be already some impact in revenues this year, which is quite interesting in ‘30. So H1, we will have, in fact, a situation in Q2 probably similar than in Q1, and you will have a rebalanced versus market in H2. The expectation on the China market as a whole are fairly steady. I think the experts is playing quite a bit inside. And of course, our goal is not only to work with the Chinese OEM in China but to work outside China. You know that we have China with BYD. You know that BYD is having a fairly clear and advocated plan in Hungary, in Brazil, in Mexico. And we know also that other Chinese OEMs are considering also sites in Europe. I know at least two with whom we are negotiating. So the development of the China OEM offer is not only about China that not only about Asia but is also in Europe, which is interesting in terms of reusing our people and capacity. On – so a possible improvement on this one, which is a bit of a factor of the evolution of the market, however. On Seating, yes, you see, for instance, the order intake that we’ve got in Seating. We are making sure that this is with good condition financially. So for me, the outperformance and the growth in Seating is by far not the only one that I’m focusing on. What is important is that we are continuing to develop the electronics activity and that we continue to progress on the improvement of the operation performance in Seating and in Interiors. So, our outperformance growth, yes, but we have to ensure that we are delivering the bottom line. And we know that in Seating and probably even more in Interiors, we still have work to do.
José Asumendi: Thank you so much.
Operator: The next question is from Sanjay Bhagwani, Citi. Please go ahead.
Sanjay Bhagwani: Hello. Thank you very much for taking my questions. I have two questions as well. My first one is on organic growth outperformance. I understand that you mentioned there is roughly 530 basis points organic growth outperformance from volume mix and pricing. Of this 50 basis points to 70 basis points is pricing. So, just the volume mix somewhere around 450 basis points, which I think is very, very strong despite a challenging Q1 last year. So, can you maybe provide some color on how this develops into the next few quarters? There is outperformance on volume mix. And then how should we think of the pricing overall in the outperformance, continue move towards zero given big inflation will be a positive contributor but then the commodities be negative? That is my first question. And my second question is rather on confirmation of the guidance. So, I understand you do not…
Olivier Durand: I am sorry, but the line is pretty bad. Can you repeat your first question? I could not hear you.
Sanjay Bhagwani: Okay. Sorry. I will just repeat my first question. So, my first question was that Q1 organic growth outperformance of volume price mix somewhere around 530 basis points and pricing is somewhere around 60 basis points to 70 basis points. So, just outperformance from volume and mix is somewhere around 450 basis points, 460 basis points. So, I wanted to know if you could provide some color on how this progress is to the coming quarters given that we understand that the Q1 last year was a very high cost. And on that, how should we think of the pricing in the next few quarters? Could this be net-net zero given the wages go up and then other parts of the commodities come down because of the indexation? So, that is my first question. Sorry, could you hear me?
Olivier Durand: Yes, sure. I hope I get it right. So, I think your question was about outperformance of revenues in coming quarters and in particular, in relation to commodity price evolution. And there was also a question about the conversion of this in operating margin. So, on the revenues, overall, we have achieved in quite all the last quarters and outperformance between 300 basis points and 500 basis points. We expect this to continue with potentially variety between geographies, as you have seen in Q1. But the overall running trend is there. And the slowdown of electrification that we see is slowing down some of the growth on part of the HELLA portfolio, as you have seen. And vice versa there is a large offset of this through the Clean Mobility activity. On commodities, we are seeing some variations on commodities, up and down actually. And you see, on particular, the oil price, you see that the brand has come up quite a bit in the recent period. Now, it’s all I have seen, I don’t know today, but yesterday was going down. And of course, it’s related to the geopolitics of the Middle East. The impact for us is with a lag because of the type of the agreements we have on the supplier and on the customer side. But today, we are expecting net-net impact, not much impact overall commodities because you have some others that are going down and let’s see about semiconductors. On the profitability, the evolution, maybe two things to mention. The first one is that the evolution year-on-year is driven a bit by the outperformance because we are in a stable market. You have – after the contribution from the exit of this toxic, [ph] just-in-time contract that we had in Highland Park, which is providing a positive evolution. You have the synergies and the synergies impact for this year is around €80 million to €90 million year-on-year. And you have the add-on benefit of the implementation of EU-FORWARD, which should bring between €30 million and €50 million in operating margin throughout the year. The mix between H1 and H2 on inflation plus on the timing of some of those savings will mean that you will have a seasonal effect on the level of profitability. You have seen that last year. And I think you will see something of the same magnitude this year. So, H1 profitability will be lower than H2 profitability as we had last year. I hope I cover your – the first question, and I understand you have the second question.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] The next question is from Christoph Laskawi at Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.
Christoph Laskawi: Good morning. Thank you for taking my questions as well. The first one will be on SOPs, which are slightly below expectations. You mentioned that for Seating. Do you experience that in other divisions as well? And what’s the visibility on that improving going forward? Do you think it’s more like supply chain related that is lower right now, or is it demand driven? That’s the first question. Thank you.
Olivier Durand: Good morning. I think the SOP delay is not so much on supply chain. So, we – there were reasons in Q1, and we have seen what happened in the Red Sea trades. But in fact, the supply chain is more resilient than before as a whole. And a case like this one, flows are diverted quite quickly. In the case of the Red Sea going through the Africa continent is between core cost in 10 days. So, there was a little bit of impact, but it’s quite marginal. We have not been the cause of any impact for information, but on the overall, not much. So – and there was Baltimore, but has been that much as well. So, I think the level of difficulties stop-and-go shortage of semiconductors. It’s not zero, but it’s I think more normal and fair level. So, I don’t think this is the cause. The cause of the delay is in, I think, more demands and variation of choice of some of the carmakers. I anticipate that this will continue to have some impact. On electrification, strictly, you see the slowdown in particular in Europe and good in North America. In Europe, that’s been largely driven by the changes on subsidies in some countries, starting with Germany. So, it has an immediate effect. Probably some of this will continue for a while, but the electrification penetration continue to grow. The question is how the carmakers will face the evolution of the CAFE regulation threshold. You know that this threshold is changing next year with a sharp drop on the road towards the full bank by mid-30s certified. And some of the carmakers have been clearly saying that in the current level of electrification of their sales, they will have to pay sizable penalties. So, either the penalties or they will adjust the pricing and the commercial strategy in order to increase the volume of electric cars being sold in Europe plus the competition of the Chinese. So, my take is that the slowdown of electrification is comparing at least for ‘25 and let’s see about the rest of the year in ‘24. What is important for us is do we have both on the different situation. You know that the vast majority of our portfolio is agnostic to board trains. But we have activities related to electrification in particular in some parts of the electronics plus lighting and vice versa. We have Clean Mobility on the non-EV side of things. And the offset is probably a bit negative on revenues, but on profitability, given the profitability of Clean Mobility and the actions we do in restructuring. It’s probably a neutral effect or close to at the bottom line. And I think that this is what is important for us given the volatility on the right-hand part of electrification.
Christoph Laskawi: Thank you. And second question is just on the disposal program and what’s still open to the next €1 billion. Should we think about that to be covered with several smaller transactions, or should there be one bigger, one making up for most of the camp that’s left? Thank you.
Olivier Durand: So, you see that we have done 25% in six months. I think it’s a rate that is not so bad in the context overall for this. You can expect the priority of operation. We expect a sizable one, and we expect some other ones to complement. So, it’s a bit of a combination. And as we mentioned, the impact on the consolidation on the Q3 numbers, is expected to be marginal, the event that some of the operations are more capital opening than strictly semi. The goal in all of these is, of course, to do operations to reduce our debt, which is the central goal, but is also simplifying the portfolio and to do it at good condition. The 25% that we have just done is leading to a capital gain of more than €100 million. So, we continue in fact to sell assets for profit. And I think it’s – we are making sure that we remain overall in this situation. So, it takes a bit of time on some of it, but the prospects are there. We just need to solidify this and to have the, let’s say, the carve-out and the financial aspect being organized so that the transactions can be executed.
Christoph Laskawi: Thank you.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] The next question is from Simon Keegan [ph] with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Unidentified Analyst: Good morning and thank you for taking my questions. My first question is in relation to the Seating contrast you cited. I was just wondering how much of that €2 billion is related to that contract? And can you give us any indication on the timing of the SOP? And then also, what was the principal differentiator that enabled you to win that contract in your view? And should this help you in further contracts in this area? And then secondly, just quickly following up on the SOP delays, are you able to quantify the impact at all? Thank you.
Olivier Durand: On your first question, you are talking about the major award that we mentioned in Seating price?
Unidentified Analyst: Yes, correct.
Olivier Durand: So, this one is with a large premium German OEM, more than €1 billion complete seats. So, the usual conversion in SOP for this is a 2 years long. And the duration of the model is 5 years to 7 years. So, I think we can give the idea of the revenue aspect. Maybe one thing that – to mention on our order intake recognition, we try to take away the edge on the level of the order intake compared to customer expectations as we know that not all cars will be as at the same level of success. So, the wider market is much more than €80 million. So, we take a cautiousness on compensating and the level of order intake are mentioning just to put this in perspective. Can you repeat your second question, sorry?
Unidentified Analyst: Yes, sure. And as just quickly on the SOP delays that you have kind of spoken to before. Are you able to quantify the impact at all?
Olivier Durand: I think the classification for Q1 only is in the €100 million, €150 million. So, something like this.
Unidentified Analyst: Okay. Thank you very much.
Operator: Mr. Durand, there are no more questions registered at this time. I will turn the conference back to you for any closing remarks.
Olivier Durand: So, thank you for this call this morning. So, you see that we continue to have outperformance in the market. We continue to have it in a diverse fashion. We are developing the Asia activity in diversified portfolio of customers, and moderating the dependency on BYD. And not only in China, but also in the rest of Asia, which is 22 million vehicles on which our market share is of course lower. So, the potential for expansion with Japanese OEM in Indian market is there, and we are geared to seize some of it. But at the end, the focus of the company is on deleveraging, and that’s why it’s very important that we have traction on our disposal program, and our financial cost and maturities on our debt. And we confirm that we are in the direction to achieve our guidance ‘24, and getting the strategic plan for ‘25 executed in all its metrics. Thank you.
Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining. The conference is now over and you may disconnect your telephones.
This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.
